Sunday, January 29, 2012

A Most Distant Globular Cluster

Well, I did it! Using Custer Institute's 0.63m (25") flagship instrument, I, along with friends and colleagues, visually observed the most distant globular cluster associated with our Milky Way galaxy! Given that distinction [of being the most distant globular cluster associated with the Milky Way] and as an object of research and study during the completion of my graduate work, observing this intergalactic stepping stone held a special interest and fascination for me. Located in the circumpolar constellation of Lynx and known as the Intergalactic Wanderer, NCG-2419 is at least 52 Kpc distant (52,000 parsecs/ 170,000 light years) or almost 10% of the distance to the Great Spiral Galaxy in Andromeda, M-31!

Known for its dark skies, Custer Institute is located in the town of Southold on Long Island's North Fork. With Lynx almost at the zenith, high in the North-Northwest, the moonless sky on the night of January 28th - 29th was brilliantly clear and dark, one of the most transparent in recent memory.

To get a sense of the scale involved, in time, space and distance, it needs to be understood that the cluster-member stars that we observed and the only stars directly observable with a telescope of this aperture (for such an object at this distance), are evolved, red giant and supergiant stars, stars such as Antares, Betelgeuse and, to a lesser extent (in that it is *only* a giant), Arcturus. Those familiar stars are bright and friendly in our own sky but, when observed at this distance, similar stars are at the limit of detection with averted vision, the brightest presenting at a visual magnitude between 16.5 – 17, barely observable as fleeting points of light. Having evolved off the Main Sequence, these luminous beacons beyond the boundaries of our galaxy and above the Galactic Halo are now using the Helium produced during their 10 billion year Main Sequence lifetime to produce energy. They have been burning bright for over 10 billion years and are among the first stars that formed, dating back to a time when the universe was much younger and quite different. At this cluster’s tremendous distance, any stars that still remain on the Main Sequence would be below the detection capability of this telescope and the telescope of comparable size used to acquire the image below, obtained during my graduate work. As such, the only representative stars available for study would include luminous Horizontal Branch, Asymtotic Giant Branch and Red Giant Branch stars (see HR Turnoff diagram below). As we indicate above, no Main Sequence cluster stars are detectable at this distance with a telescope in this size-class. The sun would be feeble, presenting at visual magnitude +23.5, well beyond the threshold of detection. Given the ancient age of the cluster, the only stars that would still remain on the Main Sequence would be late G (> G5) stars and cooler.

In order to properly understand stellar evolution, a technique used by astronomers is to observe how stars evolve as a group; in this way, we’re able to extrapolate a common origin and, hence, their age. We then compare that result with current models to gauge the model’s accuracy and veracity as well as constrain the age of the universe and the ages and evolutionary trends of galaxies and clusters of galaxies. Globular cluster stars are among the oldest stars in the universe and since NGC-2419 is so distant, well outside of the galactic halo (where most globular clusters reside) and the galaxy proper, this cluster holds a unique opportunity to better understand galactic evolution and how the member stars evolved in an isolated, extragalactic environment.

By comparing the cluster stars brightness at the given distance to where it would normally be if it were a “normal”, Main Sequence star, we can “age” the star and, hence the cluster since it has to be as old as its oldest member stars. The “turn off” point is where the star’s brightness diverges or “turns off” relative to where it should be on the color-brightness diagram, known as the HR Diagram. Since no main sequence stars were observed (Sirius, so bright in our sky, would present at visual magnitude +20), the stars represented in this study are luminous giant and supergiant stars; they are the oldest, most evolved in the cluster with ages “above” the 10 billion year turnoff point for the cluster. When first building this diagram, it wasn’t shaping up to “look like” a typical globular cluster turnoff diagram until I realized there were no “normal”, main sequence stars represented!

The following image was produced by a 0.61 meter Ritchey-Chretien telescope located in the dark, desert skies of Rodeo, New Mexico, a telescope in the same size class as that used to visually observe the cluster.


NGC-2419 As Imaged by this author
This image, produced using MaxIM DL as an L-RGB image, shows the cluster’s luminous, highly evolved red giant stars as decidedly red/ orange along with the blue stragglers appearing as a combined blue cast in and around the core. At the tremendous distance to this cluster, the individual blue stragglers are below the resolving power for this telescope and, thus, we see their combined light as a blue cast in and around the cluster’s core. Blue Stragglers are a class of star found almost exclusively in these types of clusters and are more luminous than typical Main Sequence stars. The brightest cluster stars in this image are the red giant stars and are fainter than visual magnitude +16; they have exhausted the compliment of hydrogen fuel in their cores and are now using the helium that had been built up over the preceding 12 billion years of normal hydrogen burning. The multitude of faint stars that appear as a halo and surround the central agglomeration have a visual magnitude of +20 and are at the limit of detection with the exposure and observing configuration used. Many of these threshold stars are classified as Horizontal Branch stars (see corresponding B – V Color Diagram, below). As stated earlier, they are of a comparable luminosity (brightness) as the brightest appearing star in our sky,Sirius, a Main Sequence (normal) star that is 25 times more luminous than the sun.



For further reading, my original work on this cluster can be found in the following paper, published as the second in a series of three papers as part of my graduate research: The FITS Imaging Standard in Astronomy

Thursday, January 26, 2012

Minor Planet 2012 BX34

At approximately 10:30 am tomorrow (January 27th), EST, minor planet 2012 BX34 will pass within 60,000 km or 0.0004 AU of earth's surface. A rudimentary calculation, assuming a 4 meter radius, spherical symmetry, an orbital velocity of 30 km/ sec and a density of 5, gives an energy of 600 billion (6 x 10^11) joules released on a direct impact with land. This amount of energy is 2 orders of magnitude (100x) less than the 50 terra-joule energy released with the Hiroshima blast. Although not sufficient to destroy a city, as the Hiroshima bomb was, it would be a local disaster if it impacted a populated area.

Sunday, January 22, 2012

Newt is no Gingerich

If you're wondering what the title of this blog post hast to do with astronomy, please read on. With the subject individual just winning the South Carolina primary, not only is this little tidbit informative, it gives the lie to his sanctimonious, hypocritical lecturing on truth, justice and family values.

It was so troubling to me that this buffoon shared the same surname as the world renown Harvard astronomer of the same surname, Owen Gingerich, I did a little digging. For a micro second I actually had entertained the notion that perhaps they were brothers. To my delight, I found an article that dispelled my fears, an article wherein I learned that he was born a "McPherson": http://nyukcubed.blogspot.com/2009/04/owen-and-newt-newt-and-owen.html


Owen Gingerich

Saturday, January 14, 2012

Thirty Meter Telescope Update

There is an article being shared and apparently going viral regarding India and China joining the Thirty Meter Telescope project. Published by The Daily Mail, the article's headlines claim that China and India are *Creating* the world's largest telescope. This is absolute rubbish and needs to be qualified! They are not creating the TMT at all; they are joining as observers and are contributing over $1 billion towards construction costs. The principal architects are the AURA (Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy), the California Institute of Technology, the University of California System and the Association of Canadian Universities for Research in Astronomy!

Saturday, December 24, 2011

An Astronomer's Christmas Message

On this cold, clear night when the stellar jewels are alight above, take the time, if just for a moment to gaze upwards, to make that visceral connection with that from whence we all came. Regardless of your religious persuasion, if any, we are all connected at the deepest level for those stars, that grand firmament above us, is our origin and our destiny. If for only a day, may true peace reign in our hearts and in our homes; may the guns, bombs and weapons of destruction fall silent, may the sentiment expressed by all the world’s great religions be realized if only for one night.

As you look to the east upon the brilliant jewels of Orion, Venus high and bright in the west, brilliant Sirius beckoning, know that there are others too who are gazing as you do and that this is the nexus that binds us all together, the oneness with that great canopy of stars above, fellow travelers upon this beautiful blue miracle in orbit about our home star. Having almost completed yet another circuit around that star we are reminded that, in our smallness, we are great in that we have this common bond; let us concentrate on that, be one and be at peace.


Image details: Orion from the Everglades, 1986, taken during expedition to observe and photograph Halley's Comet during its 1986 apparition; 30 second exposure on Kodak Ektachrome 400 with 100mm F/2.8, Canon AE-1; Credit: T. Madigan, all rights reserved

Friday, September 23, 2011

Faster than Light Speed? Not so fast!

Do you realize just how far reaching this result would be if true? Every physics textbook for the past 90 years would have to be rewritten; most, if not all, of modern astrophysics and cosmology would have to rewritten or thrown out completely! All of Relativity (Special and General) would be called into question with every kook who has come along challenging Einstein, claiming he was wrong and chanting "I told you so", validated. And what is this experiment that has the scientific world in such an uproar? This: that 15,000 neutrinos were measured moving at 1 part in 50,000 above light speed as they traveled from Geneva (the location of CERN) to Gran Sasso in the Apennine Mountain Range.

http://press.web.cern.ch/press/PressReleases/Releases2011/PR19.11E.html

Every experiment conducted since Einstein published General Relativity in 1915 has incontrovertibly proven that he was correct and that the speed of light is the universal speed limit. To upend a body of knowledge and understanding that has taken a century to build, you better have something more substantive that what was presented in this paper and you better have additional, independently acquired data where the result is repeatable.

To publicly suggest that such a result was observed without performing due diligence and exhaustive vetting is, at a minimum, irresponsible. In the view of this astronomer, a very simple error has gone undetected and, hopefully, a substantive and qualified errata will be published shortly.

Tuesday, August 16, 2011

JWST: What Can We Do Now?

The James Web Space Telescope is the successor to the Hubble Space Telescope, mankind's premier orbiting telescope and observing platform, an instrument that has left an enduring legacy of scientific discovery and achievement. The 6.5 meter primary mirror of the JWST has been completed and the telescope is well on its way to completion. With a mirror 3 times the diameter of HST, JWST will be able to "see" much further back and much earlier into the universe's history, to a time when the very first stars shone bright in space, to a time when the universe was a much different place than it is today. As principally an Infrared observing platform, it will give us the ability to answer fundamental questions about the universe's very beginnings, questions that are beyond the scope of even the vaunted HST. It will be able to detect Infrared sources 9 times fainter than HST and observe objects that are "red shifted" beyond detection with HST. This will all come to pass, if it is ever completed and launched!

Reacting to the widespread economic blight and with the shortsightedness so typical of many politicians eager to cut costs and expenses without considering the larger picture and the consequences of their actions, the U.S. House's Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies (CJS) Appropriations Subcommittee has recommended funding for JWST be zeroed out in the FY 2012 budget. To say nothing of the extraordinary lack of vision and foresight on the part of this particular subcommittee's leadership, it would be an unprecedented disaster if they were successful in their attempts to scuttle the James Web Space Telescope.

So, what can we do to save JWST? By way of sharing with you the following text, culled from an email sent to all members of the American Astronomical Society (AAS), an organization to which I belong, I hope to have answered that question:

Informational Email 2011-09

JWST: What Can We Do Now?

Debra Elmegreen, AAS President
Jack Burns, Chair of the Committee on Astronomy & Public Policy

Many AAS members appropriately asked, "What can we do now?" following
the shocking and disappointing recommendation by U.S. House's
Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies (CJS) Appropriations
Subcommittee to zero out funding for the JWST in the FY 2012 budget.
The answer is, "A lot"--using a well-conceived plan with community
input and public support to counter the House's action. The AAS has
been pursuing an active strategic course, but we continue to need your
help and advice as we navigate the long road ahead towards reinstating
funding for the JWST.

What can you do?
We need to sustain a grass-roots effort of education and advocacy for
JWST by reaching out to the general public. During our visit to
Capitol Hill, all the House staffers reiterated that they accept the
message from astronomers on the science merit of the JWST. They
welcome letters about what JWST will do for local communities, and
they especially need to hear from non-astronomers about the public
desire for JWST.

Here are some things you can do to support JWST:
- Write a letter to your member of Congress about what JWST will do
for your local community including jobs and the impact on STEM
education and training.
- Write a letter to the President, with a copy to your Congressmen, in
support of JWST.
- Encourage friends, neighbors, and colleagues to write to their
member of Congress to support the JWST.
- Consider writing an Op-Ed piece for your local paper on the
importance of supporting the JWST.
- Get the word out to support the JWST:
- get on a radio talk show or local news spot
- talk to school groups about JWST
- talk to community service groups such as the Kiwanis, Zonta, or
Lion's Club about JWST and ask them to talk to and write their members
of Congress.
- Continue to be active in social media, such as Facebook
(http://www.facebook.com/SaveJWST?sk=wall and
http://savethistelescope.blogspot.com/) and Twitter
(http://twitter.com/#!/SaveJWST).
- Sign a petition, such as
http://www.change.org/petitions/do-not-cancel-funding-for-the-james-webb-space-telescope.

Helpful material is available on the AURA site, which has compiled a
list of background information, recent articles, and related support
letters from international astronomical organizations:
http://www.aura-astronomy.org/news/news.asp?newsID=264.

What is AAS doing for the JWST?
We traveled to Capitol Hill this past week to continue the work of the
AAS Executive Officer, Kevin Marvel, and the AAS John Bahcall Public
Policy Fellow, Bethany Johns, to resume discussions about the JWST
during the August Congressional recess; it was a time of reduced
tension from the absence of television cameras and Congressional
members on the Hill, and a pleasantly reduced humidity in Washington.
By the end of our conversations, we were encouraged that (1) our
community has done an outstanding job of making the science case to
the Congress and the Administration, (2) that NASA has made major
efforts to re-tool the management of JWST with attention now focused
at the highest levels of the Agency, and (3) that a thorough
rebaselining plan has been completed to put the project on a solid
funding foundation toward launch in 2018.

We began our discussions with Rick Howard and Eric Smith, who are
leading the efforts to revamp the management and funding plans for
JWST at NASA headquarters. We learned that the rebaselining plan,
called for in the Casani report, has been completed, reviewed, and
accepted at all levels of the NASA administration. Most importantly,
NASA accepts the premise that JWST is now an agency priority, and thus
would be managed and funded as such if approved. This is a key change.

Next, we went to the Capitol to visit with staff from the House CJS
Appropriations Subcommittee and from office of the Chairman, Rep. Wolf
(R-VA). We had a frank and honest conversation with the staff about
JWST's recent cost overruns and mismanagement, as outlined in the
Casani report. The staff expressed Rep. Wolf's belief that JWST has an
extremely strong science merit and that this has been well articulated
by members of the AAS. The staff commented that they have been
inundated by social media correspondence about JWST and have made note
of recent editorials in the NY Times and Washington Post. They were
also pleased to learn about NASA's new management plan for JWST and
the attention being paid by the upper management of the Agency. Part
of the motivation for the subcommittee's action was to "get NASA's
attention on these broader, Agency-wide management issues at the
highest levels." Now, the problem remains getting the rebaselined
budget out of the Executive Branch's Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) so that members of the House and Senate can use those numbers in
developing next year's FY2012 federal budget. Time is of the essence.
Our efforts need to be focused next on making the case to the
Administration to have the OMB approve the rebaselined plan, and make
it publicly available as soon as possible.

We also visited the staff from Ranking Minority member of the CJS
subcommittee, Rep. Fattah (D-PA). His staff along with several other
staff members from influential Democratic members of the House,
including Rep. Schiff from southern California, pledged for their
Congressmen to contact the White House to plead for the release of the
rebaselined plan from OMB.

What happens next?
The Debt Limit Deal practically stalled all remaining appropriations
bills from reaching the House floor for a vote. The real action will
be in the House-Senate conference committee to hash out a final budget
for NASA. After Congress returns in September, the action will move
toward the Senate where Senator Mikulski's (D-Maryland) CJS
subcommittee will mark up the NASA bill. We are encouraged by Senator
Mikulski's public support for JWST. We are hopeful that the House and
Senate will be able to work out an agreement to support continued
funding for JWST using the rebaselined budget for NASA.

Continued vigilance, communication with staffers on the Hill, and
public pressure throughout the Fall will be essential if we are to be
successful. This week Roger Blandford will lead another delegation to
NASA and the Hill to continue conversations. We are only in the first
battle of this fight, with months of effort still needed. It will
require a concerted community effort.

We will continue to send regular updates via this e-mail exploder to
seek feedback and to keep you informed. Thank you for all that you've
done so far and for your continuing efforts to keep JWST on track for
launch later in the decade.