Sunday, January 29, 2012

A Most Distant Globular Cluster

Well, I did it! Using Custer Institute's 0.63m (25") flagship instrument, I, along with friends and colleagues, visually observed the most distant globular cluster associated with our Milky Way galaxy! Given that distinction [of being the most distant globular cluster associated with the Milky Way] and as an object of research and study during the completion of my graduate work, observing this intergalactic stepping stone held a special interest and fascination for me. Located in the circumpolar constellation of Lynx and known as the Intergalactic Wanderer, NCG-2419 is at least 52 Kpc distant (52,000 parsecs/ 170,000 light years) or almost 10% of the distance to the Great Spiral Galaxy in Andromeda, M-31!

Known for its dark skies, Custer Institute is located in the town of Southold on Long Island's North Fork. With Lynx almost at the zenith, high in the North-Northwest, the moonless sky on the night of January 28th - 29th was brilliantly clear and dark, one of the most transparent in recent memory.

To get a sense of the scale involved, in time, space and distance, it needs to be understood that the cluster-member stars that we observed and the only stars directly observable with a telescope of this aperture (for such an object at this distance), are evolved, red giant and supergiant stars, stars such as Antares, Betelgeuse and, to a lesser extent (in that it is *only* a giant), Arcturus. Those familiar stars are bright and friendly in our own sky but, when observed at this distance, similar stars are at the limit of detection with averted vision, the brightest presenting at a visual magnitude between 16.5 – 17, barely observable as fleeting points of light. Having evolved off the Main Sequence, these luminous beacons beyond the boundaries of our galaxy and above the Galactic Halo are now using the Helium produced during their 10 billion year Main Sequence lifetime to produce energy. They have been burning bright for over 10 billion years and are among the first stars that formed, dating back to a time when the universe was much younger and quite different. At this cluster’s tremendous distance, any stars that still remain on the Main Sequence would be below the detection capability of this telescope and the telescope of comparable size used to acquire the image below, obtained during my graduate work. As such, the only representative stars available for study would include luminous Horizontal Branch, Asymtotic Giant Branch and Red Giant Branch stars (see HR Turnoff diagram below). As we indicate above, no Main Sequence cluster stars are detectable at this distance with a telescope in this size-class. The sun would be feeble, presenting at visual magnitude +23.5, well beyond the threshold of detection. Given the ancient age of the cluster, the only stars that would still remain on the Main Sequence would be late G (> G5) stars and cooler.

In order to properly understand stellar evolution, a technique used by astronomers is to observe how stars evolve as a group; in this way, we’re able to extrapolate a common origin and, hence, their age. We then compare that result with current models to gauge the model’s accuracy and veracity as well as constrain the age of the universe and the ages and evolutionary trends of galaxies and clusters of galaxies. Globular cluster stars are among the oldest stars in the universe and since NGC-2419 is so distant, well outside of the galactic halo (where most globular clusters reside) and the galaxy proper, this cluster holds a unique opportunity to better understand galactic evolution and how the member stars evolved in an isolated, extragalactic environment.

By comparing the cluster stars brightness at the given distance to where it would normally be if it were a “normal”, Main Sequence star, we can “age” the star and, hence the cluster since it has to be as old as its oldest member stars. The “turn off” point is where the star’s brightness diverges or “turns off” relative to where it should be on the color-brightness diagram, known as the HR Diagram. Since no main sequence stars were observed (Sirius, so bright in our sky, would present at visual magnitude +20), the stars represented in this study are luminous giant and supergiant stars; they are the oldest, most evolved in the cluster with ages “above” the 10 billion year turnoff point for the cluster. When first building this diagram, it wasn’t shaping up to “look like” a typical globular cluster turnoff diagram until I realized there were no “normal”, main sequence stars represented!

The following image was produced by a 0.61 meter Ritchey-Chretien telescope located in the dark, desert skies of Rodeo, New Mexico, a telescope in the same size class as that used to visually observe the cluster.


NGC-2419 As Imaged by this author
This image, produced using MaxIM DL as an L-RGB image, shows the cluster’s luminous, highly evolved red giant stars as decidedly red/ orange along with the blue stragglers appearing as a combined blue cast in and around the core. At the tremendous distance to this cluster, the individual blue stragglers are below the resolving power for this telescope and, thus, we see their combined light as a blue cast in and around the cluster’s core. Blue Stragglers are a class of star found almost exclusively in these types of clusters and are more luminous than typical Main Sequence stars. The brightest cluster stars in this image are the red giant stars and are fainter than visual magnitude +16; they have exhausted the compliment of hydrogen fuel in their cores and are now using the helium that had been built up over the preceding 12 billion years of normal hydrogen burning. The multitude of faint stars that appear as a halo and surround the central agglomeration have a visual magnitude of +20 and are at the limit of detection with the exposure and observing configuration used. Many of these threshold stars are classified as Horizontal Branch stars (see corresponding B – V Color Diagram, below). As stated earlier, they are of a comparable luminosity (brightness) as the brightest appearing star in our sky,Sirius, a Main Sequence (normal) star that is 25 times more luminous than the sun.



For further reading, my original work on this cluster can be found in the following paper, published as the second in a series of three papers as part of my graduate research: The FITS Imaging Standard in Astronomy

Thursday, January 26, 2012

Minor Planet 2012 BX34

At approximately 10:30 am tomorrow (January 27th), EST, minor planet 2012 BX34 will pass within 60,000 km or 0.0004 AU of earth's surface. A rudimentary calculation, assuming a 4 meter radius, spherical symmetry, an orbital velocity of 30 km/ sec and a density of 5, gives an energy of 600 billion (6 x 10^11) joules released on a direct impact with land. This amount of energy is 2 orders of magnitude (100x) less than the 50 terra-joule energy released with the Hiroshima blast. Although not sufficient to destroy a city, as the Hiroshima bomb was, it would be a local disaster if it impacted a populated area.

Sunday, January 22, 2012

Newt is no Gingerich

If you're wondering what the title of this blog post hast to do with astronomy, please read on. With the subject individual just winning the South Carolina primary, not only is this little tidbit informative, it gives the lie to his sanctimonious, hypocritical lecturing on truth, justice and family values.

It was so troubling to me that this buffoon shared the same surname as the world renown Harvard astronomer of the same surname, Owen Gingerich, I did a little digging. For a micro second I actually had entertained the notion that perhaps they were brothers. To my delight, I found an article that dispelled my fears, an article wherein I learned that he was born a "McPherson": http://nyukcubed.blogspot.com/2009/04/owen-and-newt-newt-and-owen.html


Owen Gingerich

Saturday, January 14, 2012

Thirty Meter Telescope Update

There is an article being shared and apparently going viral regarding India and China joining the Thirty Meter Telescope project. Published by The Daily Mail, the article's headlines claim that China and India are *Creating* the world's largest telescope. This is absolute rubbish and needs to be qualified! They are not creating the TMT at all; they are joining as observers and are contributing over $1 billion towards construction costs. The principal architects are the AURA (Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy), the California Institute of Technology, the University of California System and the Association of Canadian Universities for Research in Astronomy!